U.S. lenders including Bank of America Corp. still face years of litigation and billions of dollars in liabilities tied to the housing collapse after agreeing to settle a probe of abusive foreclosure practices.
Government officials can pursue claims related to the packaging of loans into securities, criminal-enforcement actions and fair-lending violations, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said yesterday. The $25 billion deal with the five biggest servicers ends state and federal probes into shoddy foreclosures and pays for debt forgiveness, refinancing and other efforts to keep struggling homeowners in their properties.
“It’s a big check with narrow immunity,” said Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and now an analyst with FBR Capital Markets in Arlington, Virginia. “You get the state attorneys general off your back, but you’re not getting immunity from securitizations, which could come with their own steep cost down the road.”
Banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Ally Financial Inc. negotiated with regulators for 16 months to seek the broadest possible release from claims tied to the creation and servicing of mortgages. They agreed to a deal that doesn’t liberate them from further losses.
“Because of the narrow nature and the fact that the banks didn’t get the widespread assurances they were seeking, this was mostly meaningless,” said David Lykken, managing partner at Mortgage Banking Solutions, an Austin-based consulting firm.
More Investigations
President Barack Obama announced during his State of the Union speech last month the creation of a government unit to investigate misconduct in the bundling of mortgage loans into securities. The group will streamline and strengthen current efforts to investigate fraud, Holder said Jan. 27.
Regulators are “aggressive” on pursuing securities claims and created a task force to do so, said Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan. The deal doesn’t protect banks from claims related to creating defective loans sold to government-owned Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, he said.
“It wasn’t the servicing practices that created the bubble, nor caused its collapse,” Donovan said. “It was the origination and securitization of these horrendous products.”
While banks have largely reserved for costs from the deal announced yesterday, bigger lenders may still face as much as $2 billion a quarter in legal expenses, said Richard Bove, a bank analyst at Rochdale Securities LLC, in an interview with Bloomberg Television. He compared lenders’ predicament to that faced by tobacco and asbestos firms after government agreements.
Expecting Lawsuits
“What we’re going to see for the next five to seven years is these lawsuits going through court after court,” Bove said.
The five biggest home lenders had $72 billion of costs tied to repurchases, litigation, foreclosures and errors on faulty mortgages since 2007, with Bank of America paying the most. Investors who buy loans are entitled to ask for refunds or compensation if they find missing or inaccurate data on home values or the borrower’s income.
“If you think about the overall housing market, there’s a wide array of issues and no one action is going to put all of that to a close,” Mike Heid, president of mortgages for San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, said in an interview. “Today’s settlement is a big step forward in a very substantial and meaningful piece of the business.”
A Complex Task
Adhering to the settlement provisions will be a challenge for banks, said Terry Moore, a managing director at Accenture Plc. Bank of America, struggling to handle mortgage refinancing after a U.S. program boosted demand, told some customers they must wait 90 days before starting an application.
“The work flow that’s required and the loan level that needs to be researched and understood in order to look at the individual borrower’s situation, it’s a complex task, and it requires skill and resources,” Moore said.
Citigroup Inc., the third-biggest U.S. bank, said it will adjust its fourth-quarter and full-year results to reflect an $84 million after-tax charge related to the settlement. The firm accounted for $2.2 billion of the settlement. Citigroup will record an additional $125 million after-tax charge to the results “in connection with the resolution of related mortgage litigation,” according to the statement.
The settlement doesn’t prevent states from pursuing claims that banks’ use of a mortgage database may have led to improper foreclosures. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a suit this month alleging that the banks misled homeowners, undermined foreclosure proceedings and created uncertainty about ownership interests in properties.
Dan Frahm, a spokesman for Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America, and Mark Rodgers of New York-based Citigroup didn’t respond to e-mails seeking comment. Ally spokeswoman Gina Proia and Kristin Lemkau of New York-based JPMorgan declined to comment on banks’ expected costs.
--With assistance from Laura Marcinek and David McLaughlin in New York and Dakin Campbell in San Francisco. Editors: Dan Reichl, David Scheer.
Government officials can pursue claims related to the packaging of loans into securities, criminal-enforcement actions and fair-lending violations, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said yesterday. The $25 billion deal with the five biggest servicers ends state and federal probes into shoddy foreclosures and pays for debt forgiveness, refinancing and other efforts to keep struggling homeowners in their properties.
“It’s a big check with narrow immunity,” said Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and now an analyst with FBR Capital Markets in Arlington, Virginia. “You get the state attorneys general off your back, but you’re not getting immunity from securitizations, which could come with their own steep cost down the road.”
Banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Ally Financial Inc. negotiated with regulators for 16 months to seek the broadest possible release from claims tied to the creation and servicing of mortgages. They agreed to a deal that doesn’t liberate them from further losses.
“Because of the narrow nature and the fact that the banks didn’t get the widespread assurances they were seeking, this was mostly meaningless,” said David Lykken, managing partner at Mortgage Banking Solutions, an Austin-based consulting firm.
More Investigations
President Barack Obama announced during his State of the Union speech last month the creation of a government unit to investigate misconduct in the bundling of mortgage loans into securities. The group will streamline and strengthen current efforts to investigate fraud, Holder said Jan. 27.
Regulators are “aggressive” on pursuing securities claims and created a task force to do so, said Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan. The deal doesn’t protect banks from claims related to creating defective loans sold to government-owned Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, he said.
“It wasn’t the servicing practices that created the bubble, nor caused its collapse,” Donovan said. “It was the origination and securitization of these horrendous products.”
While banks have largely reserved for costs from the deal announced yesterday, bigger lenders may still face as much as $2 billion a quarter in legal expenses, said Richard Bove, a bank analyst at Rochdale Securities LLC, in an interview with Bloomberg Television. He compared lenders’ predicament to that faced by tobacco and asbestos firms after government agreements.
Expecting Lawsuits
“What we’re going to see for the next five to seven years is these lawsuits going through court after court,” Bove said.
The five biggest home lenders had $72 billion of costs tied to repurchases, litigation, foreclosures and errors on faulty mortgages since 2007, with Bank of America paying the most. Investors who buy loans are entitled to ask for refunds or compensation if they find missing or inaccurate data on home values or the borrower’s income.
“If you think about the overall housing market, there’s a wide array of issues and no one action is going to put all of that to a close,” Mike Heid, president of mortgages for San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, said in an interview. “Today’s settlement is a big step forward in a very substantial and meaningful piece of the business.”
A Complex Task
Adhering to the settlement provisions will be a challenge for banks, said Terry Moore, a managing director at Accenture Plc. Bank of America, struggling to handle mortgage refinancing after a U.S. program boosted demand, told some customers they must wait 90 days before starting an application.
“The work flow that’s required and the loan level that needs to be researched and understood in order to look at the individual borrower’s situation, it’s a complex task, and it requires skill and resources,” Moore said.
Citigroup Inc., the third-biggest U.S. bank, said it will adjust its fourth-quarter and full-year results to reflect an $84 million after-tax charge related to the settlement. The firm accounted for $2.2 billion of the settlement. Citigroup will record an additional $125 million after-tax charge to the results “in connection with the resolution of related mortgage litigation,” according to the statement.
The settlement doesn’t prevent states from pursuing claims that banks’ use of a mortgage database may have led to improper foreclosures. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a suit this month alleging that the banks misled homeowners, undermined foreclosure proceedings and created uncertainty about ownership interests in properties.
Dan Frahm, a spokesman for Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America, and Mark Rodgers of New York-based Citigroup didn’t respond to e-mails seeking comment. Ally spokeswoman Gina Proia and Kristin Lemkau of New York-based JPMorgan declined to comment on banks’ expected costs.
--With assistance from Laura Marcinek and David McLaughlin in New York and Dakin Campbell in San Francisco. Editors: Dan Reichl, David Scheer.
Post a Comment